I bave been told I should be positive on this blog, upbeat and stick to what I am doing right, enough depressing stuff in the world. But I have to tell others why I am farming, the pressure to do things the conventional way is enormous and constant, by questioning conventional farming one putting a sign on one self: Here is a farmer who thinks he knows better than the experts.
I am not claiming I know these things, I just think it is better to err on side of caution, if there is the slighted change these drugs can harm the animals and even more importantly us, they should not be used.
To me it is such an obvious fact and by denying we are going down the road of immorality. I can understand and sympathize with the farmer caught in the middle, either get with the program or get out, the salesman or those working at the drug company for a salary, people have to make a living.
But somewhere there is a person, free enough to make the moral chose. That’s where I come in, I can decide to raise my pigs in a way I think is wholesome both for pigs and us.
But then I have to be able to write and talk about it, even rant, helps me focus and think clearly. Maybe nobody reads this, a pep talk to myself. So here I am, damn the torpedoes….
My daughter Ulla sent me this link about the drug paylean or ractopamine hydrochloride used in pigs, cattle and turkeys. As I have said before, I am no expert on drug use in meat animals and don’t want to be, but I think quite a bit on the morality of using these drugs, both on how they affect the well being of the animals and possible harm to humans who consume the meat. Can we trust what the experts say, are they not on a payroll somewhere? Do they really know what they are talking about?
The article says this drug is used on 60 to 80% of pigs in this country, then on top of other drugs like antbiotics that are administred, not to contol a disease but to enhance weight gain on less feed.
The article says:
Part of a class of drugs called beta-agonists, ractopamine mimics stress hormones, making the heart beat faster and relaxing blood vessels.
And: Pigs fed the drug in the last weeks of their life produce an average of 10 percent more meat.
Also: Ractopamine leaves animals’ bodies quickly, with pig studies showing about 85 percent excreted within a day. But low levels of residues can still be detected in animals more than a week after they’ve consumed the drug.
One has to assume, that an animal adding up to 10% more meat tissue, must be affected, both physically and mentally, says the drug affects the stress level in the animal: mimics stress hormones, making the heart beat faster and relaxing blood vessels.
But even if one did not have a morality problems with how the animals feel, there is the residue problem: Residues can still be detected in animals more than a week after they’ve consumed the drug.
Are you confident those residue levels will not affect us in anyway, we have a very complicated nervous system. Would you as a farmer feel morally at peace feeding this drug to your pigs, knowing the meat will end up as food for human beings?
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/feebet/mib/mib82e.shtml
Pigs fed ractopamine hydrochloride may be at increased risk for exhibiting the fatigued or downer pig syndrome particularly when marketed at high body weights. Pig handling methods to reduce the incidence of fatigued or downer pigs should be thoroughly evaluated prior to initiating the use of this medicated feed.
I don’t see how one can assume that a drug that changes a pig that drastically, won’t do something in a human being, even at residue levels. You just can’t and therefore a moral issue.


